Review




Structured Review

Procell Inc macrophage phenotypes
Macrophage Phenotypes, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/macrophage phenotypes/product/Procell Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macrophage phenotypes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

97
ATCC m1 phenotype macrophages
miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
M1 Phenotype Macrophages, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 phenotype macrophages/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m1 phenotype macrophages - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Miltenyi Biotec m2 macrophage panel 2a human cancer cell phenotyping cd133 pe s16016b miltenyi biotec
miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
M2 Macrophage Panel 2a Human Cancer Cell Phenotyping Cd133 Pe S16016b Miltenyi Biotec, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/m2 macrophage panel 2a human cancer cell phenotyping cd133 pe s16016b miltenyi biotec/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m2 macrophage panel 2a human cancer cell phenotyping cd133 pe s16016b miltenyi biotec - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Procell Inc macrophage phenotypes
miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
Macrophage Phenotypes, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/macrophage phenotypes/product/Procell Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macrophage phenotypes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Bruker Corporation m1 macrophage phenotype
miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
M1 Macrophage Phenotype, supplied by Bruker Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/m1 macrophage phenotype/product/Bruker Corporation
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m1 macrophage phenotype - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Galectin Therapeutics m2 macrophage phenotype 5 galectin
miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h <t>(M1</t> <t>macrophages).</t> miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.
M2 Macrophage Phenotype 5 Galectin, supplied by Galectin Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/m2 macrophage phenotype 5 galectin/product/Galectin Therapeutics
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
m2 macrophage phenotype 5 galectin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher macrophage phenotypic markers cd86 #12-2069-42
In vitro evaluation of the ability of BHB-dABs to balance inflammation and protect mitochondria. (A) Schematic diagram illustrating the lysosomal escape function of BHB-dABs. (B) Immunofluorescence images showing the lysosomal escape of ABs and dABs after engulfment by macrophages. (C) Statistical analysis of the number of ABs and BHB-dABs phagocytosed by macrophages. (D) Statistical analysis of the lysosomal escape efficiency of ABs and BHB-dABs. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of <t>CD11b</t> and CD86 in THP-1 cells under different stimulation conditions. (F) Typical fluorescence images of the mitochondrial membrane potential of macrophages from different treatment groups for 0, 1, 2, and 3 d. (G) Statistical analysis of the proportion of CD86 + cells. (H) Statistical analysis of relative mitochondrial tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) fluorescence intensity. (I) Typical western blotting plots and (J to N) statistical analysis of protein expression in macrophages after different treatments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; LA, lipopolysaccharide + adenosine triphosphate.
Macrophage Phenotypic Markers Cd86 #12 2069 42, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/macrophage phenotypic markers cd86 #12-2069-42/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macrophage phenotypic markers cd86 #12-2069-42 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
fluidigm 15 parameter panel maxpar human monocyte macrophage phenotyping panel kit
In vitro evaluation of the ability of BHB-dABs to balance inflammation and protect mitochondria. (A) Schematic diagram illustrating the lysosomal escape function of BHB-dABs. (B) Immunofluorescence images showing the lysosomal escape of ABs and dABs after engulfment by macrophages. (C) Statistical analysis of the number of ABs and BHB-dABs phagocytosed by macrophages. (D) Statistical analysis of the lysosomal escape efficiency of ABs and BHB-dABs. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of <t>CD11b</t> and CD86 in THP-1 cells under different stimulation conditions. (F) Typical fluorescence images of the mitochondrial membrane potential of macrophages from different treatment groups for 0, 1, 2, and 3 d. (G) Statistical analysis of the proportion of CD86 + cells. (H) Statistical analysis of relative mitochondrial tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) fluorescence intensity. (I) Typical western blotting plots and (J to N) statistical analysis of protein expression in macrophages after different treatments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; LA, lipopolysaccharide + adenosine triphosphate.
15 Parameter Panel Maxpar Human Monocyte Macrophage Phenotyping Panel Kit, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/15 parameter panel maxpar human monocyte macrophage phenotyping panel kit/product/fluidigm
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
15 parameter panel maxpar human monocyte macrophage phenotyping panel kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Sangon Biotech mouse macrophage phenotypic markers primer sequences
In vitro evaluation of the ability of BHB-dABs to balance inflammation and protect mitochondria. (A) Schematic diagram illustrating the lysosomal escape function of BHB-dABs. (B) Immunofluorescence images showing the lysosomal escape of ABs and dABs after engulfment by macrophages. (C) Statistical analysis of the number of ABs and BHB-dABs phagocytosed by macrophages. (D) Statistical analysis of the lysosomal escape efficiency of ABs and BHB-dABs. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of <t>CD11b</t> and CD86 in THP-1 cells under different stimulation conditions. (F) Typical fluorescence images of the mitochondrial membrane potential of macrophages from different treatment groups for 0, 1, 2, and 3 d. (G) Statistical analysis of the proportion of CD86 + cells. (H) Statistical analysis of relative mitochondrial tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) fluorescence intensity. (I) Typical western blotting plots and (J to N) statistical analysis of protein expression in macrophages after different treatments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; LA, lipopolysaccharide + adenosine triphosphate.
Mouse Macrophage Phenotypic Markers Primer Sequences, supplied by Sangon Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse macrophage phenotypic markers primer sequences/product/Sangon Biotech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse macrophage phenotypic markers primer sequences - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h (M1 macrophages). miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.

Journal: Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B

Article Title: Dual metabolic-inflammation modulation in MicroRNA@neutrophil-derived microvesicles achieve robust osteoarthritis therapy

doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.09.020

Figure Lengend Snippet: miR140@MVs inhibit the pro-inflammatory effect of LPS-induced BMDM in vitro . (A) The intracellular location of Cy3-miR140@FITC-MVs in BMDM cells stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 24 h (M1 macrophages). miR140 is labeled with Cy3 (Red) and MVs are stained by FITC-Annexin V (Green). The nuclei were stained by Hoechst 33342 (Blue). Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative flow cytometric analysis of BMDM treated with different formulations. The (C) M1 (CD86 + CD206 – ) and (D) M2 (CD86 − CD206 + ) phenotypes were analyzed by Flowjo. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with M1 group. n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (E) Western blotting of TLR4 in LPS-induced BMDM treated with different formulations. (F) The relative expression of the protein band was analyzed by Image J and normalized to its respective baseline controls. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. ∗ P < 0.05. The relative mRNA levels of (G) TNFα , (H) IL6 , (I) IL1β , (J) IL10 , (K) TGFβ in LPS-induced BMDM receiving different formulations. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, compared with the M1 group, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (L) The TNF α level in LPS-induced BMDM supernatant was detected by ELISA assay. The data are shown as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA test with Tukey's correction, n = 3. No significance, ns; ∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗ P < 0.0001. (F–I) Values are normalized to the M1 (baseline control) group.

Article Snippet: To obtain M1 phenotype macrophages, RAW264.7 was treated with LPS (100 ng/mL) (Invitrogen, CA, USA) for 24 h. L929 mouse fibroblast cells were purchased from the ATCC and grown at 37 °C with 5% CO 2 for 7 days in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS.

Techniques: In Vitro, Labeling, Staining, Western Blot, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control

In vitro evaluation of the ability of BHB-dABs to balance inflammation and protect mitochondria. (A) Schematic diagram illustrating the lysosomal escape function of BHB-dABs. (B) Immunofluorescence images showing the lysosomal escape of ABs and dABs after engulfment by macrophages. (C) Statistical analysis of the number of ABs and BHB-dABs phagocytosed by macrophages. (D) Statistical analysis of the lysosomal escape efficiency of ABs and BHB-dABs. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of CD11b and CD86 in THP-1 cells under different stimulation conditions. (F) Typical fluorescence images of the mitochondrial membrane potential of macrophages from different treatment groups for 0, 1, 2, and 3 d. (G) Statistical analysis of the proportion of CD86 + cells. (H) Statistical analysis of relative mitochondrial tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) fluorescence intensity. (I) Typical western blotting plots and (J to N) statistical analysis of protein expression in macrophages after different treatments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; LA, lipopolysaccharide + adenosine triphosphate.

Journal: Research

Article Title: Biosynthesis of Lysosomally Escaped Apoptotic Bodies Inhibits Inflammasome Synthesis in Macrophages

doi: 10.34133/research.0581

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro evaluation of the ability of BHB-dABs to balance inflammation and protect mitochondria. (A) Schematic diagram illustrating the lysosomal escape function of BHB-dABs. (B) Immunofluorescence images showing the lysosomal escape of ABs and dABs after engulfment by macrophages. (C) Statistical analysis of the number of ABs and BHB-dABs phagocytosed by macrophages. (D) Statistical analysis of the lysosomal escape efficiency of ABs and BHB-dABs. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of CD11b and CD86 in THP-1 cells under different stimulation conditions. (F) Typical fluorescence images of the mitochondrial membrane potential of macrophages from different treatment groups for 0, 1, 2, and 3 d. (G) Statistical analysis of the proportion of CD86 + cells. (H) Statistical analysis of relative mitochondrial tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM) fluorescence intensity. (I) Typical western blotting plots and (J to N) statistical analysis of protein expression in macrophages after different treatments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001. PE, phycoerythrin; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; LA, lipopolysaccharide + adenosine triphosphate.

Article Snippet: After 24 h, the expression of the macrophage phenotypic markers CD11b (#11-0113-42, eBioscience, USA) and CD86 (#12-2069-42, eBioscience, USA) was analyzed using flow cytometry to analyze the polarization of THP-1 cells toward M1 macrophages.

Techniques: In Vitro, Immunofluorescence, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Fluorescence, Membrane, Western Blot